| |
| “TypeReader’s editing features are superior to those
in OmniPage and AccuText from Xerox Imaging Systems Inc.” |
MacWeek |
| |
“This correction process brings up an interesting interface
trade-off made by TypeReader’s designers.”
|
MacWeek |
| |
| “Most of the packages allow you to check through the scanned
pages ... The most sophisticated of these proofing tools are found
in TypeReader, and OmniPage Pro.” |
MacUser |
| |
“Its interactive correction window is fast and easy to use,
but you won’t have to use it much--TypeReader tends to get its
OCR right the first time.”
|
Computer |
| |
“the way in which it (TypeReader) handles proofing is very
good. Not only can you choose what is checked automatically by setting
the “Proofing Options”, but you can also decide how rigorous
the checks are by varying the suspect threshold. You can select the
fonts you prefer for font mapping as well. As you move, a magnified
image of the original scan appears immediately above so you can see
exactly what characters or words were misrecognized. This is extremely
useful as it prevents you having to find the hard copy you scanned
and provides a very fast way of editing any errors.”
|
Micro Computer Mart (UK)
|
“We prefer TypeReader Pro (compared to TextBridge Pro) for
both its recognition accuracy and its useful editing facilities...TypeReader’s
editing and correction facilities are exemplary...”
|
MacFormat (UK) |
