| |
| “TypeReader also does not need to be trained to recognize
unusual fonts,” |
PC Week
|
| |
“TypeReader gave the best results in my testing, especially
with different pages, such as faxes and pages with unusual sizes and
style of type fonts ...”
|
Los Angles Times |
| |
“The technology is advanced; the power and sophistication
are impressive ... TypeReader is a superb choice for anyone in the
market for a top-self OCR product.”
|
Windows Magazine |
| |
“TypeReader matches or outperforms even the best of its competition
when it comes to character accuracy, thanks largely to its deft handling
of small fonts, draft-quality matrix print, and other difficult samples
...” |
InfoWorld |
| |
"OmniPage Professional's error rate increased dramatically
with 6-point type, especially when compared with that of TypeReader...TypeReader
offers capability across a range of fonts and materials that none
of its competition can thus far match, making it a top choice for
nearly any application...”
|
PC Magazine |
| |
“The product that had the highest accuracy rate on the more
challenging documents was TypeReader...”
|
Word Perfect for Windows Magazine |
| |
“ExperVision certainly can read some fonts the leading off-the-shelf
packages can’t” |
PC Week |
| |
“We scanned the same paragraph in 12-point Zapf Chancery with
TypeReader, OmniPage Pro, and WordScan Plus ( products of two major
competitors ), for example, and TypeReader delivered a significant
higher accuracy rate than either of its rivals. TypeReader distinguishes
itself from the competition with the ability to recognize an impressive
variety of font...”
|
MacUser |
| |
“Our Conclusions: ExperVision’s TypeReader is the First
Place winner for accuracy,”
|
Imaging Magazine |
| |
“ExperVision’s TypeReader was the most accurate overall,
and this alone would deserve the best buy award. ...-- it is based
on later technology (than OmniPage, AccuText, etc.) and it showed,
especially when processing difficult pages with text that joined or
was breaking up” |
MacUser |
| |
“ExperVision, Inc. has pioneered a proprietary character recognition
technology that represents a new and unique departure from existing
technologies. ... TypeReader keeps total document accuracy high when
working with original as well as degraded documents; non-stylized
as well stylized fonts; correct as well as imperfect scanning; and
simple as well as complex page formats.” |
Indy PC News |
| |
“TypeReader Professional is one of OCR champions, with exceptional
levels of accuracy and convenience...It’s interactive correction
window is fast and easy to use, but you won’t have to use it
much--TypeReader tends to get its OCR right the first time.” |
Computer Shopper |
| |
“A tougher OCR test is translating skewed pages. OmniPage
created random gibberish when translating pages skewed more than 5
percent; even some low cost OCR products can do better than that.
However TypeReader perfectly translated a photocopied business letter
skewed by as much as 15 percent...TypeReader Professional 3.0XA is
faster and more accurate (than OmniPage Professional 6.0)...However,
OCR software is more commonly used to convert a pile of paper documents
into editable text files. For that TypeReader Professional 3.0XA is
faster and more accurate (than OmniPage 6.0).”
|
PC Magazine |
| |
“ExperVision has introduced a technology it calls Fragment
Analysis to its OCR package...TypeReader is certainly powerful...all
but TypeReader Professional encountered problems with our skewed text
sample...TypeReader Professional is the way to go...It performed extremely
well in both automatic and manual modes...TypeReader Professional
took the test page, straightened it and then recognized it. Other
software packages (TypeReader Professional, OmniPage Professional,
OmniPage Direct and Xerox TextBridge) had problems recognizing the
words, let alone de-skewing the image...”
|
MacUser |
| |
“ExperVision has produced an excellent OCR product called
TypeReader 3.0XA...Many times faxes and other documents have background
color, marks and lines. This program automatically removes them as
it scans...I have tried several OCR programs and most of them are
not as fast or accurate as TypeReader. It even retains the complete
document format and layout...I highly recommend this product to all
those who like to save time...”
|
Toledo PC Users Group |
| |
“TypeReader was significantly more accurate than all other
products...with TypeReader’s impressive 99.5% accuracy...”
|
MacUser |
| |
“TypeReader is now affordable, and the OCR for real world
documents (Faxes, photocopies, dot-matrix documents)...OCR products
are typically capable of recognizing approximately 200-300 plain,
non-stylized typefaces. Using TypeReader’s recognition technology,
TypeReader can recognize more than 2,000 typefaces. TypeReader can
do these basic tasks, but it can also get the entire page into your
word processor or spreadsheet as is - retaining the shape, form, type
and spacing, as well as the content of the input page.”
|
Blue Chips Magazine |
| |
“I was impressed that TypeReader Professional was able to
recognize text on a gray background and produce an almost perfect
text copy on screen. Other OCR programs I have used balk at this kind
of operation?” |
Micro Computer Mart (UK) |
| |
“Caere and Xerox products may have the highest profiles in
the OCR market today, but in our tests, TypeReader Pro from ExperVision,
Inc. of California achieved the highest consistent levels of accuracy
across the widest range of scanned documents. ... The new version
of TypeReader Pro [TypeReader Pro 4.0] demonstrates even higher levels
of accuracy and delivers improvements in format and page layout retention...With
TypeReader’s improved ability to replicate the page layout of
the original document, its speed, and enhancements to its already
consistently high levels of accuracy, it continues to be a very strong
contender in the OCR category.” |
Law Office Technology |
| |
“Again, the accuracy difference may only have been a few words
here and there. But OCR users will tell you that it is those niggling
errors here and there that aggravate the OCR process. Reduce these
in any way and you have done much to improve productivity and helped
maintain sanity. TypeReader definitely gets high marks in this category.”
|
Central Jersey Comp. Club
|
| |
“With the majority of the test-fonts, the software (TypeReader Pro
5.0) achieved 100% accuracy, falling to between around 90% on some
of the more obscure variations. With Arial, Century Gothic, Verdana,
and Times New Roman it managed to get 100% recognition on a variety
of different sizes. It even managed to recognize single words with
mixed font sizes - particularly impressive. Surprisingly, it failed
to recognize the Courier New font (pitch 12) - here it only achieved
a 15-20% recognition rate. It also failed to acknowledge a paragraph
in Times New Roman pitch 8, and saw it only as a graphic image.”
|
Shareware Review
|